By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
padib said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope. If I ask which seems prettier than that is purely subjective and any choice based on opinion is valid and true for the one choosing.

I don't value photorealism... I think Journey is gorgeous, I like cell-shaded graphics. But If someone presents me a portray of a scene almost replicating the scene and the other some kind of surreal picture I'm certainly will preffer the first. If someone do a replica with the same level of detail, lightining and everything else but only difference is collor palete I would have to see both to judge.

But UC and Zelda can't be compared on that because Zelda don't have 10% the graphical assets of UC. For me the comparison people do to always put a Nintendo game ahead (we saw it for Driveclub vs MK8, last gen we saw UC vs Mario Galaxy, and if we look almost all similar cases) indepent. For me that is like pitching something from renaissance to impressionism from someone like Da Vince, Michelangelo or Manet to a work from expressionism or Surrealism but quite unknow but good artist and says the second group is better just because it is more artistic, creative, not trying to copy reality... I haven't encountered in this forum anyone from Nintendo camp (you included) that says he thinks a Sony game looks better than a Nintendo game... some will say technically Sony is more advanced (some will dispute even that) but they will always go for "artistic direction" to justify. So I find hard to believe 100% of people in a group will preffer cell-shadding to photorealism with a straight face and not to uphold a company he preffers.

That's because you want to see Nintendo fans as biased. I could easily find a link to me, personally, stating that I though Infamous: Second Son's graphics to be the best of the generation so far, with Mario Kart 8 following next.

You want to see Nintendo fans as biased against Sony because you feel threatened. You interpret posts the way you want to, and that's why you constantly run into problems with certain Nintendo fans.

The best example is how you reacted to me in the SF V thread, about me not liking the dual-shock in fighting games due to the placement of the analog stick. You immediately interpreted that as me just hating on Sony, which actually I couldn't give the least care about Sony when it comes to Street Fighter. I love the series so the console wars is so much less important to me when it comes to that game.


As you said... I can have problems against certain Nintendo fans, not against Nintendo or its fans. So you can figure why. And you are one quite vocal agaisnt Sony, and of course I can't read all the threads on this forum from all posters and remembers they all. And don't pretend you don't bash Sony in several occasions.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."