By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
starcraft said:
dabaus513 said:
Either way its more stacked than the 360's 08 and 09 lineup combined.

lol. Right. Things have changed in the last 6 months buddy. Games got delayed etc. The 360's 2008 line-up is now easily comparable to the PS3's, more diverse, and some would argue, better.

Hey now. You can have the first but the last two are subjective. I think the PS3/360 match up well genre to genre though. Some people consider Bioshock and Call of Duty all the diversity they need enough though they are in the same genre.

Certainly you can't which is better, b/c many games have yet to come out and near have a lot to prove! (ex. Fable 2, Too Human, Banjo Kazooie 3, White Knight Story, Heavy Rain, Killzone 2, etc.)

Lol, tell the bolded part to Dabaus and Spartan.

Of course everything I typed was subjective, but there is certainly no longer a reasonable argument for those that believe the PS3's 2008 line-up blows away the 360's.

Lets examine the titles you just listed and their chances of being good.

Fable 2:  First game scored high, previews at and since GDC were all very good, innovative Co-op and AI.

Too Human:  New IP, could go either way.  Started out with poor previews a year ago, now they are all good.

Banjo Kazooie 3:  First two were AAA or close, this game is being made by the original team.

WKS:  Only limited information on this game.  Could go either way, repetitive looking combat (though that holds for all JRPG's).

Heavy Rain:  Know nothing, there has only been a tech demo.

Killzone 2:  The first game was a shocker, this game has faced fake movies, delays, rumours of mediocrity and budget blowouts. 

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS