And the other funny thing is that if a game is closer to realism then automatically it have no art style or direction giving a 0 even if technical is 10... but if a game just is cell shaded them it gets 10 for art style and direction and 8 for technical.... Where the hell do people live that just because they preffer one game more than other them they can't even make a objective judgement without fearing to be seen as a traitor???
I hate most FPS to the guts, but I wouldn't discuss KZ is better than Halo, or even say Journey is better graphically than Gears of Wars.... I like the style of Journey (it is pretty) and God of War+UC and others are a lot better than Gears, but Journey could be a Monet painting and I wouldn't say it looks better than Gears just because "it's more artsy", and that is just because it is cell shaded...
Next step is saying Anime looks better than movies because they involve more art. And I do love Anime.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
