| pokoko said: I really have no idea what the title means. It seems to be more a part of the OP's agenda than the original article. Smaller games continue to be made, just as more ambitious games continue to be made. Both should exist and I enjoy selections from each type. I get the impression that this is just a soapbox thread so the OP can complain about games he doesn't like. |
actually my framing is correct if you read the article. that's precisely what the writer, jeremy parish, is saying. i don't see this 'soapbox' nonsense you seem to want to attribute to me, i'm sharing an article and my impressions of it and trying to see what other people think of it.
my commentary, the whole sentence and a half of it there is, takes issue with simplistic, industrialized game design (call of duty) and bad programming (ac unity). is it no longer allowed to have opinions on internet forums? coz i thought that was kind of the point.







