makingmusic476 said:
fazz said:
makingmusic476 said:
fazz said:
makingmusic476 said:
I'm not saying that the Wii isn't more powerful than the PS2. It's much more powerful than the ps2. I even said so in the first line of the post you quoted. What I'm saying is that the difference between the ps3/360 and Wii is greater than the difference between the Wii and ps2. |
Explain why my friend.
And while we're at it, let's post a first-gen PS2 game: Done by no others than the graphics pioneers at Squaresoft  |
You chose that craptastic game to show off the ps2? Yet you use 1st party Nintendo titles to show of the Wii? GT3, released less than a year after the ps2 came out in Japan: Compared to MK Wii, a Nintendo title, released a year and a half after the Wii came out: Compared to GT5P, released a year after the ps3 came out in Japan: That is why, my friend. |
I've always seen Sony fans praise Square for their ambition on graphics department, that's why I choose that one...
And how can we compare the cartooniest racing game EVER with a realistic one? What's there to compare? I can see more detail, more polygon count and better texture resolution in the Kart one in comparison to the GT3 one. And GT3 was released 13 months after PS2's launch... just saying. |
First, I don't own a single Square game, and I've never played a single Final Fantasy. *puts up flame shield* Second, you can notice things like polygons and texture resolution in any shot, regardless of artstyle, and you have done just that. Third, yes, the MK shot looks better than the GT3 shot. I've said it time and time again, I'm not saying that the Wii isn't more powerful than the ps2. It is. Easily. I'm saying that the gap between the Wii and ps3/360 is larger than the gap between the ps2 and Wii. MKWii looks a lot better than GT3 (and GT4), but GT5P looks WAY better than MKWii. And finally, yeah, I kinda switched April and March in my mind.  |
