By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:
Dark_Feanor said:
Why aren´t people raging of that offence to half the players?

It only works one way?

As has been explained a few times if you go back to read some of the previous posts, by Tamron for example, it would be a comparable situation if the previous itteration of SF sold vastly more on the Xbox platform, and SFV was initially advertised as Multiplatform.
But that's not the case. SF4 sold more on PS3, and it was advertised as PS4 and PC exclusive right off the bat.

MS bought Dead Rising. Sony seem to have funded this development in some way or another. (Though the fact that it's advertised for PC right away suggests it's different from how MS acquired TR.)

WoW!!!

So much logic spin guys.

One thing that I´m proud is my memory. I remember how Tomb Raider situation was delt here and other foruns. It also tells me that TR was never advertised to any platform before the XOne exclusive deal. Also, "...sold vastly more..." is a pointless argument, one have to assume Capcom lost money porting SF4 to Xbox 360 and they would also lose money porting to the XOne.

PC version sugest clearly that Sony moneyhated SFV in some way similar to Dead Rising, both belong to Capcon, and they can do whatever they want that is not bound by  exclusivity agrements.

This is how things works, just don´t be hypocritical saying this case is different from Tomb Raider or others third party exclusives deals.