spurgeonryan said:
@Don Ferrari
RARE is over half the reason the N64 is so popular! |
I played a lot of rare games and n64 before I had money for ps1. But even they being half the reason of N64 success that represents what? 20M consoles due to Rare against the average 120M of PS platforms? Do you see why I doubt Rare would net any real effect on MS topping Sony?
their phylosophy is different and that reflects in gaming enviroment and why Sony dominates when they play right or equalize the rivals when they fumble on everything.
the consistency Nintendo have on the quality of their game Sony have for putting out systems (consoles).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
