DonFerrari said:
cfin2987@gmail.com said:
DonFerrari said
|
Indeed they can, but there is a different between expression and force. Some people would have them bend over and do what they are told to do. The best worlds are the ones where people and companies have freedom of expression, as long as it's not at the expense of someone elses.
Taking away Targets right to choose would be wrong. By them doing this, they have harmed no one. The other expression, however, is stating that target should be controlled. That is wrong.
|
You know the petition have done exactly what you are saying is wrong, you know? People aren't demanding a store to sell what they want, but the petitioners to try to censor a game.
|
Yes. It seems that I am so impartial that I am confusing you. It's a fucking travesty, ok? People need to live and let live and stop butting their fucking nose into everything. They didn't need to make a fuss, and then when the game was pulled, the people that want it forced back onto the shelves are just as bad. Humans would fight over anything, like holy shit!! Think about it.
|
Good thing you were so clear, but not. You Just got lost in your argument. A side pushing for censorship and the other are equally as bad? Ok then. If they were forcing babies 'r us to sell porn I would agree with you. But "forcing" a company to not bend over a ridiculously claim isn't a bad thing at all.
|
No. Let me say that again NO. Don't put words in my mouth. I refused to take sides and everything I said related to everyone involved. I was never arguing and just making statements. You became confused because I wasn't taking sides. We don't all needlessly take one side of an argument you know? We're not all fan boys and girls.
