By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cfin2987@gmail.com said:
Ka-pi96 said:
cfin2987@gmail.com said:

It's a free market. A store can sell or not sell what they like. Seriously people, get over it. Babies or us don't sell it either because their customers wouldn't agree. It's pure business sense.

Yeah, they can sell or not sell whatever they want. But people can certainly be upset about them refusing to sell something for such a pathetic reason.


Indeed they can, but there is a different between expression and force. Some people would have them bend over and do what they are told to do. The best worlds are the ones where people and companies have freedom of expression, as long as it's not at the expense of someone elses.

 

Taking away Targets right to choose would be wrong. By them doing this, they have harmed no one. The other expression, however, is stating that target should be controlled. That is wrong.


You know the petition have done exactly what you are saying is wrong, you know? People aren't demanding a store to sell what they want, but the petitioners to try to censor a game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."