DJEVOLVE said:
Wonder how Publisher feel about spending millions upon millions on Triple AAA titles when people contant with a game that doesn't even come close. Actually if I was a Publisher I would be offended by this list. The list should be AAA -------- Indies there is a big difference, combining them is being intellectual dishonest about the content on these game, also direspect to the people making the games. |
I mean, I don't know where to start but I will try, keeping in mind you are the same poster who thought people uploading receipts for InfoScout was the epitome of random surveying.......
The "flood" of indies is nothing more than an evolving ability and empowering of smaller studios having access to publish games on new platforms. Your argument about Indie v. AAA is so outlandish and failing at logic that it makes me nauseous. This idea that somehow because more people have a good time my time is somehow less good is so ridiculous.
Again, this mindset like the entitled demographic of every generation (not videogame generation) that says the upcoming generation is going to ruin the world and you sulk and are miserable because other people are evolving and the world is changing. The world isnt ruined but the people complaining just have more wrinkles and less fun than everyone else.
Newsflash: No AAA games were or will be harmed during the recording and publishing of Indie games. This strange idea of a dystopian lack of AAA games with no basis other than rigidity and inflated ego and importance is nothing new. Your strawman needs more straw....and a hat.
