So, after 8 years running, it's safe to assume that the past generation (Wii, 360, PS3) has already seen its best games - Sorry Persona 5. So why don't we vote for the best (and worst?) games, studios and publishers of the generation?
Here are the categories:
Genres (according to the VGC Database):
Pick 3 at most (1st: 3 Points, 2nd 2 Points, 3rd 1 Point)
- Best Action Game
- Best Adventure Game
- Best Platform Game
- Best Racing Game
- Best Role-playing Game
- Best Shooter
- Best Sports Game
- Best of Miscellaneous (Misc, Puzzle, Simulation, Strategy)
Special Awards:
Pick only one (1 Point)!
- Best Graphics
- Best Story/Writing
- Best Music
- Best Single Player
- Best Coop Multiplayer
- Best Competitive Multiplayer
Fun Awards:
Pick only one (1 Point)!
- Best Low Rated Game (Sku with most reviews is below 75 on Metacritic)
- Worst High Rated Game (Sku with most reviews is 90 or above on Metacritic)
- Best Game Nobody Played (< 1 million Wii+360+PS3 combined according to VGC)
- Worst Game Everybody Played (> 10 million Wii+360+PS3 combined according to VGC)
BIG Awards:
Pick only one (1 Point)!
- Best Developer (NOT Publisher!)
- Best 3rd Party Publisher
- Best 1st Party Publisher/ Best Console
THE BIG ONE:
Pick at most 10 (10 to 1 Points)!
- Best Game of the Generation








