By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kerotan said:

how is bloodbourne or the order moneyhatted? both are knew ip's created by sony and they hired devs to make them. It's not like it's a 3rd party game that's going to be multiplatform and then they throw 50M at them to keep it PS4 only.

i'll take the words of many more xbox players than you. they prob play the less popular gamemodes. i would try the game out but it's not my type of game. just like i won't buy destiny, call of duty (anymore), halo, bloodbourne etc etc I only buy games I like and don't fall for the hype. 

You might want to tell Miyazaki that Sony created Bloodborne, as he gives interviews talking about his inspiration for the setting of the game and his decisions about certain gameplay elements. Doesn't really sound like Sony created the IP at all, sounds more like Sony paid someone to make a game. Which, of course, is fine. But it's just funny to see you crap on one company for doing it and then throwing out two games for PS4 that are not first party.

The bold is funny to me, it's like you're admitting to being ignorant on the matter and almost proud to take flawed input from people as opposed to someone who plays the game every day. Also, I'm just gonna throw it out that you're talking out of your butt about "countless players" and "many xbox players" telling you the game is dead. Either way, since you're admitting they probably "play the less popular gamemodes", maybe stop treating the testimony of these make believe forum members as Gospel? You can take the "less popular game modes" of any game online game and say the community must be struggling.


Also,

Kerotan said:
The reality is if Titanfall was selling well enough the price would have been slashed. Hell even Infamous second Son is still a good bit more expensive.

The funny thing about this quote is you're proving Pugg's point without even realizing it. So Titanfall wouldn't have had a price cut if it sold well enough, and Infamous is still a "good bit more expensive". And yet.. Titanfall on Xbone has outsold Infamous, even with the huge install base difference. So if Titanfall is getting prices slashed due to poor sales, shouldn't Infamous be even lower priced do to lower sales? Or just maybe you're wrong and don't understand that online only games require different strategies to keep the (required) player base stimulated and playing? And at the same time, there's no need for Sony to drop the price of Infamous because of (apparently) low sales. If I buy Infamous today, there could be literally 3 other people in the world playing and it wouldn't affect my experience one bit. But 3 other people playing Titanfall, that's different.

And it worked, by the way. As I said before I only play LTS, probably middle of the pack in terms of player count, and over the last week or so as stores have had pre-BF and BF sales and the digital sales, the playlist has routinely been in the hundreds of players just on my server. Always full rooms. Never waiting for it to find a game.