| padib said: If the devs don't make games for it, but the console can run most adventure games at an enjoyable level, then the reason the games aren't being made is more likely a business decision (not saying it's a good or bad one). Ultimately the U is perfectly adequate for adventure games but bottom line it all depends on your value system. If graphics are everything then sure the U won't be enough, but for more adventure fans I would say that story, art direction and worlds are the most important part of a game. For that reason I could still greatly enjoy a game like A Link to the Past or Warcraft III or what have you, even though they are older games. I mentioned War 3 because even though it's not an adventure game, the art style is awesome. |
I'd have to disagree about you ultimitely having better adventure games. While I agree about the Wii U being able to run most games you're going to have a decent down grade for the mor intense ones. That will take away from the imersiveness of the adventure but it's not a major deal, I agree.
But you can't say the Wii U is better for adventure games. I mean look what the PS4 has that the Wii U doesn't. Dragon Age, Far Cry, Shadow of Mordor, The WItcher 3, Next Final Fantasy, The Last of US, GTA 5, Unity, Infamous second son, trine 2, tomb raider, diablo 3, final fantasy 14, metro last light, metro 2033, the walking dead games, the wolf among us games, borderlands will be coming and countless more on the way. ames like uncharted 4, no mans sky, silent hills, resident evil revelations 2.
I'm sorry but the PS4 is just a better adventure platform. Nintendo excell in other areas better than Sony but not here. They are better with fighting games and platformers.
