By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Million said:

@tresters , happy ?

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=23496&start=250

HappySquirrel Said:
"Because of the additional processing power requirements to display HD graphics it is reasonable to say that the difference in processing power from the PS2 to the Wii is similar to the difference in processing power from the Wii to the PS3/XBox 360."

"The Gamecube and XBox would have been 1.5 to 2 times as powerful as the PS2, and the Wii is (at least) twice as powerful as the Gamecube and yet developers used the PS2 as the base to produce many Wii games; on top of this XBox 360 and PS3 games are required to display at HD resolutions which (believe it or not) uses additional processing power."

The Ghost of Rubang said:

" The GC and XBox weren't only slightly better than the PS2. The PS2 was ridiculously weak in comparison to either of them, but it had the most market share so it had the most games and was the lead dev console. The Wii's just replacing it in every way."


Did younot enjoy the PS2? Did you not enjoy the PS2 ports to the Gamecube/ XBox? They all worked fine... even though they were coming from a much weaker console. What's wrong with getting your games ported from the wii to the PS360? If they're still upgraded Graphics wise, (Which GC and XB games were) then I don't see any problem.

(In other words, I agree with Rubang)



 

 

 

Guitar Hero 3/ Smash Hits