nanarchy said:
|
Well. slight correction there, he wasn't shot for trying to do it again, he was shot because he'd already assaulted the officer, backed off when the first shot was fired (through the car door), and then killed because he wouldn't get down on the ground (maybe charging him, maybe not, the witness accounts conflict there). The problem here is he'd already shown he has absolutely no respect for authority, and a perfect willingness to commit assault. On the other hand, due to the conflicting witness accounts, we can't prove either the cop killed him without need, or that the victim wasn't charging him for further physical aggression.
It's really reminiscent of the Treyvon Martin case, due to a lack of corroborating testimony from all witnesses, and the 2nd party not being alive to represent their side, you can't just convict because of emotional feelings. The system is certainly flawed, and there's most certainly a race problem in the US, but, when you can't prove something, you can't just say guilty. No matter how much public opinion may want it.







