A_C_E said:
In that commercial at the bottom it clearly states actual features and functionality may vary. The commercial then stated there's a new way to play and that you are the controller; all true. It shows a kid fighting in front of a screen and another racing using just her bare hands, both you can do on kinect. Then it states you can use your whole body; also true. Then it states it tracks full body motion; again, true. It then states that you can use your own gear; kinect IS capable of doing this but not sure how many games (if any) take advantage of it, but still, nothing illegal here since the feature exists. Facial recognition exists, connecting and sharing exists, voice recognition exists, controller free entertainment also exists. I don't get the point of the video...? Sony did something different. They advertised specific features that never came to fruition or just simply didn't exist. Microsoft deals with ALOT more lawsuits than Sony does so its not like MS isn't targeted. If MS did the same thing Sony did then MS would get sued just like Sony did. |
So it isn't lying if you put small letters in the footer saying the ad may not cover the entire reality or it's just a protection against suing?
About Sony lawsuit it wasn't because one feature never came to fruition (altough 3G MP didn't worked for it, altough it works for playing from ps4) but mainly because of a function that wasn't applied to all games (crossplay).
Anyway as I said no one is complaining Sony got sued, but the idea that MS haven't done it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







