Sony issuing refunds for Vita purchases before June 1, 2012

[DonFerrari]

A_C_E said:

DonFerrari said:

kowenicki said:

one forms a potential contract with a buyer and one doesnt.

its basic legal principles and why they have been fined.

its very, very, very simple.

 

I see, Sony ad is a form of contract but ms ad aint? Seems coherent.

 

But I go back to the lying portion, since no one is complaining of Sony being sued. But you claimed they deserve it because they lied to sell a product, but for MS you invent apologies, ok then. I don't think discussing this further with you will add anything.

But there is a difference between a press conference/interview and an advertisement. If there is an advertisement where MS lied then they can be sued just like all other corporations. 

If someone is talking about their product they made and telling others what the future looks like then its fine if some things are missing or aren't followed through on. But when an advertisement is televised or marketed to people displaying the capabilities but don't actually exist or aren't followed through with then that company is going to get sued.

I'm pretty sure this was advertised, at least in Brazil it even got to television.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2qlHoxPioM

Also bullshot and fake footage in TV is the same... but I get it, MS never done it even if evidence contradicts it.