By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
VXIII said:

It is a business decision to attract more customers, it has nothing to do with "limiting creativity". They are investing into fresh experiences, as said, thier new IP, Bloodborne, is coming before this.

Look at all the next gen rehashes recently; The Last of Us Remastered, Wind Waker, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, the list goes on. That's a lot of resources that would be better spent on actual new experiences. 

I mean, if it floats your boat, more power to you, but I'd rather something fresh.


Did you also complain at the beginning of the last gen when the consoles got ports and slight up res games like King Kong, Burnout Revenge, Tomb Raider Legend, Gun, Need For Speed Most Wanted, Tony Hawks, Full Auto, Fight Night 3, Far Cry Instincts, Just Cause, Splinter Cell Double Agent?  That first year or so full of old gen games mixed in with a few new ones didn't do them consoles any harm did it?

Stop moaning about it and just don't buy them if you dont want to.  They obviously aren't catered to your tastes.  But as someone (like me) who had a 360 last gen I didnt get to play Last Of Us and I didn't play DS2 either as I had already moved over to the new consoles so whats the problem?

If developers remaster some of these games and it puts a bit of easy money in their pocket, then as a consumer you would like to think this extra revenue goes into making new IP's that little bit better because they have healthier resources to draw from.



PREDICTIONS FOR END OF 2015: (Made Jan 1st 2015)

PS4 - 34M - XB1 - 21m - WII U -12M