By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NJ5 said:
Million said:
@ Yes the Wii is less value for money than the PS3 , the PS3 is far more versatile than the Wii in it's functionality (Blu-Ray,Folding,Linux ETC), has probably the best line up of games this year , better online,superior graphics,physics and the list goes on.

Like i've said before the Wii sells to some of the same people that buy the 360 and the PS3 , but it has created a new market it monopolises where it sells to old people , teenage girls , little kid's [PEOPLE WHO GENERALY NEVER BOUGH CONSOLES].

Value is totally subjective... The fact that more people are buying Wiis than PS3s shows that more people think the Wii is worth its price. Your opinion is in the minority.

 

Your totaly right on your first point , value is totaly subjective but i'm refering to "value on paper" in atempt to measure it's value objectivley. Personaly i'd feel more comofrtable paying £300 for a PS3 than I would paying £300 for a Wii but that's just me.

You'd be correct on your second point if the Wii and the PS3 where the same price , despite the PS3 being better value for money it doesn't stop it being expensive . To put it simply Organic food is probably better value for money than chemicaly grown produce however it's high price point means it'll still get outsold by chemicaly grown food because most people don't have the money to pay thatm much.