CGI-Quality said:
In regards to is LBP 3 worse than LBP 2, the answer is no. It doesn't really matter if an individual finds the platforming average, the franchise (and games) have all been good at what they set out to achieve. LBP 3 fine tunes everything wrong with the past games (albeit, with a bug here or there, something the series has always had to suffer from, to a degree, given everything available). But my opinions of each game is also irrelevant. What's wrong with reviews today are not the reviews themselves (evident by the fact that most reviewers agree that LBP 3 is the best in the series), but because everyone chases numbers instead. I can call a game crap, but give it a 9, while calling another game excellent and then give it a 6. At the end of the day, my words mean zilch, because the numeric score will overshadow them. That is what's wrong with modern day reviews. I've said this since the end of the 6th generation, they need to go back to how they were during the Atari 2600/NES days (yep, I'm old enough to remember that). Back then, it was word of mouth, not whether a game got a 7 or a 9. |
A lot of independent reviewers I watch on youtube don't use scores.
Youtubers like somecallmejohnny, Gamexplain, Jwitz, Wiiviewr, Wiifolderjosh, Bradleynews, thevelcrogamer, cjszero01, the completionist, etc
Check them out if you haven't heard of them already!







