By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 21 November 2014
Edit Thread
bowserthedog said:
DonFerrari said:
bowserthedog said:

Wouldn't really call it cherry picking.  It's just where I live. I'm not always familiar with american pricing. My point is that it should be for consumers to decide on value. I don't believe Sony was giving the real reason why they rejected the proposal from EA. They didn't want to have to compete with EA for subscription based services on their own console and in this case Microsoft is coming off as being more open and more third party friendly.


consumer may decide not buying ps4 or its games. and sony probably weren't allowed to disclose real reason as they probably signed nda covering alot of aspects and can publically discuss them. ms have even more subs so they would risk losing even more subs (sony didn't had even 4M against ms 40M+ subs at the time) so this don't make much sense.


I'm just grumpy i didn't get to play Dragon Age 5 days early!


Feel sorry for you... is digital a possibility to you?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."