| ckmlb said: Most of the games look really similar with small differences here and there with lighting and blurriness or edges or whatnot, but it looks like Bethesda was the only company to actually put effort into making their game release on the PS3 that was a year later actually look signifcantly better. Here's a feature that Gamespot do often comparing 360 and PS3 multiplat games' graphics: http://www.gamespot.com/features/6171831/p-5.html Oblivion was the only one that looked better on PS3 significantly (as in more than what you notice by looking really closely) |
Those look more due to better mapping on the textures. That could just as easily be due to them using their resources better, than the PS3's specs.
Not cliaming the PS3 won't have advantages, but it would have to be something where every explaination other than the PS3's abilities is eliminated as an explaination.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








