EricFabian said:
See, anyone can do the same. I'm not saying Wii U is better value than PS4/X1 but is not arrogance, is his job |
You basically named the 100% games available now, and probably 80-90% of the best games WiiU will have in its entire cycle. On PS4 and XBO I just named a few of the games you can play only this year and just a few you'll play in the next years, I don't even named exclusives for PS4 and XBO. I was nice, compassionate with WiiU, but if I did with PS4/XBO the same as you did with WiiU I could name at least more than 100 games (good and big seller games) you won't play on WiiU ever.
The games I listed that you can't play on WiiU right now are the biggest sellers and most essential to most of the console gamers. Nintendo fans think that the baseline for Nintendo homeconsoles sales is Wii, but the reality is that it was always like WiiU since Playstation came in 1994. N64, GC and WiiU have the same pros and cons. You can play some of the best games ever from Nintendo (and they're just a few...), but nothing more.
The thing with Nintendo homeconsoles is not the games that you can play, is the games that you can't. Wii was the exception to the rule.
And Fils-Aime is arrogant because he's is the first that is making a comparison with the competition saying they're better. Even if it was true, that's by defintion arrogance. I know is his job to sell their product, but to me, being arrogant is not the best way for Nintendo right now.