| Zekkyou said: If you're going to use the price of online as a point of criticism against the PS4/X1, you should also include the huge amount of value provided by stuff like PS+. Regardless to what you think of the service, your argument comes across a very one sided when you ignore such a significant part of what is being offered. Anyway, the WiiU's linear value isn't really relevant. To many, it's lack of 3rd party support, relatively poor hardware and comparatively poor multi-media functionality (compared to even the PS3), makes the WiiU a pretty poor value proposition. |
The 2nd paragraph I totally agree with. That's why the main reason when choosing a console is the games it has/will have. Period. That is the deciding factor. But like I said I'm not talking about games. I'm saying you'll end up paying more on a console were you have to pay for online gaming than the 350$ price-tag they made you believe it is.
As for the 1st, although I don't deny it offers other/better stuff, personally I don't think many people would pay for that. Just look at the increase PS+ had from its PS3 era to PS4 era. That happened because with PS4 they have to subscribe for the online gaming.







