HoloDust said:
As I already said it here (and illustrated it with two almost same, but fundamentally different pictures) http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6840083 there's a place and time for everything - if 1886 art designers wanted for game to look colorful, it would, as shown, as it's not as big of a deal to get there. |
I was joking on the notion that more colors = more artistic view...
And of course more color isn't hard to do on the games that are supposedely grey/brown they just would look out of place and in some cases uglier besides not coherent.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."









