OttoniBastos on 15 November 2014
| CavemanCavan said: He's the only reviewer on the planet that realizes average isn't 7.5. That makes him the man with one eye on a planet of the blind as far as I'm concerned. |
This^
People need to understand that Angry joe's 6 isn't the same as IGN's.
Big site reviewers have short number range when it comes to reviews
basically:
9+: must have
8+:average
7+:stable shit
6+:Shit with bugs or anti-consumer's features but you can play it
5+:Shit with bugs AND anti-consumer's features but you can play it
4+: Shit so broken you can't play it
3+: It causes damage to you machine
2+: don't even boot
1+: it's basically printf("hello world");
in other words,when a IGN gives a 7 for a game,the game is shit or they are against the game for some reason...
Angry joe knows how a score range should be but people are so used to the doritocracy model that they think AJ is wrong....
