| Mr Puggsly said:
Again, occasional crashing issues is not the same as broken online. Crashing is a nuisance, broken online can stop you from enjoying that game. |
I get what you are saying and no one is exagerating anything. But you need to understand that what you are saying doesn't apply to everyone. I can count how many games I have taken online in my entire life with both my hands. I am just simply not a heavy online gamer. And teher are many like me that couldn't be bothered about playing online. DC at its core works, even online works when you can get into a game. The problem with DC is maintaining a connection when online or even getting in.
Everything about ACU is sub par. The game as a whole simply does not run well. Be it online or off.
All I am saying is that they are both buggy games. Its not about which is more buggy than which cause both can just as easily be fixed with the right patch. But you sem to be here trying to say that ACU buginess is not as bad as DC bugginess as if any kinda bugginess is acceptable.
I am also trying to point out that at least with DC they are doing things that not only actually adresses the bugs the game has but also trying to compensate gamers for all th etrouble. Ubisoft is not even saying a single word in relation to how messed up the game they released was regardless of every single publication on the internet talking about it. They have actually shown that they are stil working on the game and willing to release speedy patches, but to fix microtransactions? They also purposefully held back reviews of the game for 12hrs after the game was released so a lot of gullible/ignorant/illinformed people would still rush out and buy the game before reviews come in.
I dunno, if you think what they are doing is ok or they are not as bad as DC or even worse... then I don't know what to say to you. And I have played and even enjoyed buggy games before. There are some bugs I can deal with and some I can't.
