Captain_Tom said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Well... the 4k monitors we have right now are, for the most part, pretty terrible... A lot of the "lower" end 4k monitors such as the dell one which costs $500 have issues such as having a 30hz refresh rate or having terrible color shift when viewing from different angles and etc so I think that 4k still has a bit ways to go before things like IPS panels get implemented at an affordable price.
And yes, freesync is not available yet but I do think that it will only really start to take off near the end of 2015 to 2016 at minimum. There will be monitors with either freesync or g sync enabled but for the most part, I doubt they will be worth it for most people until 4k ready monitors become more affordable and less shitty
|
Again wrong. My brother bought a NEW Samsung 4K 60Hz monitor for under $600 a few months ago. Yeah it isn't IPS, but its color is still far and above most 1080p monitors, and you get 4x the resolution. They are already here, look around.
|
Whats the model number cause from the reviews I have seen... The Problems of TN is still there with a lot of color shift in the vertical angles as well as the colors being a saturated at the top vs the bottom. Again, my point is, first they need to get the display features right by having options such as an affordable IPS 4k display before they will widely implement things like FreeSync and G-Sync which is still, I would say, almost a year away before it really starts taking off
