AMD : FreeSync Monitors Shipping in December – Will Cost $100 Less Than Nvidia G-Sync

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

vivster said:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Well, to me, it doesn't sound like that G-Sync is what most people are focusing on atm when it comes to buying a new monitor cause I feel like that more people will be focusing on the 4k rather than G-Sync or Freesync until 4k monitors become very affordable for consumers. Now, I am not saying the technology is useless and I am well aware that its a big improvement over normal V-sync but I do think that if given the choice between 4k or G-Sync/FreeSync, I think people would rather choose 4k or wait for a true 4k level monitor with FreeSync/G-Sync rather than buy a 1440p or 1080p monitor with G-Sync/FreeSync

And sure, the "Enthusiast" Level PC gamers will buy it no matter as well as buy 4k monitors but I don't really think that they are the vast majority of the PC gamers out there

No one is really caring to get one right now because they are barely available. The selection really bad. I probably wouldn't get a G-Sync monitor right now even if someone gave me the money for it.

Free Sync monitors don't even exist yet so it's hard to get many people excited about it.

I suppose but to me, it doesn't exactly seem like manufacturers are lineing up to make G-sync enabled monitors either. We won't really know for FreeSync until it comes out but again, (as of right now) it seems that more manufactureres are trying to get 4k out of the way cause its the "new hot thing that people want" and then later down the line, when 4k becomes more affordable for consumers, implement things such as FreeSync and G-Sync rather than just implementing either from the gecko. I am sure there will be some models of 4k or lower (as there already are some for 1440p and 1080p) with either G-Sync or FreeSync avaliable but in terms of becoming very popular, I think it will be a bit later down the line.