Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
mjk45 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
mjk45 said:
So it 's not enough that you made your point , but you have to keep regurgitating it , also your point about apologists is a little strange , you are anti people defending Sony but bagging Ms and since the reverse is true those that attack Sony but defend Ms are also in your sights so it seems you live in a nice little paradox world but that's what can happen when you generalize . then again maybe you're Ralph Nader of the video game world or simply against everyone . |
Or maybe I don't like/approve of hypocrisy.
|
There is nothing wrong with being anti hypocrisy , but it shouldn't be done by generalizing , but realising some peoples defence may be legit and examing whether or not their arguement holds up , rather than painting every one as apologists and lumping all practices together as if they all merit the same type of commdemnation ,otherwise you end up looking like your against allsides.
|
I'm not generalizing everyone as apologists. I'm generalizing all sides as having apologists. All long as that is recognized, then it is fine, its not hypocritical. The fanbases being identical. Its also impossible to objectively weigh one action as worse then another because its effects inherently subjective to each observer. That necessitates equal treatment.
|
You weigh them on their merits , not on the notion that both sides have apologists so that's my get out clause when it comes to looking at counter arguements.
