Wright said:
Augen said: It does make reviewing games tricky these days. I mean, if a game was released horribly buggy and had a massive patch a week later would you say "3/10 for broken mess" or "8/10 for fixing the issues"? Server issues seem even more vague because one person's experience could vary greatly from another. "I cannot get on, this game is unplayable! 0/10!" "I had no issues, this game is amazing! 10/10!" Not sure how you aggregate those experiences within a review or if the reviewer goes on their own experience in a bubble of what other's experienced. |
Both reviews should be present, then. Put the timestamp and highlight the mistakes of the first reviewed version, then put the second one which explains the change.
|
A fair compromise, I do wonder then if this is sorted do you have a third score? Or stick with second saying the issue diminished the experience, but that new comers should refer to the first score since they will not experience it that way.