By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wright said:
Augen said:
It does make reviewing games tricky these days. I mean, if a game was released horribly buggy and had a massive patch a week later would you say "3/10 for broken mess" or "8/10 for fixing the issues"?

Server issues seem even more vague because one person's experience could vary greatly from another.
"I cannot get on, this game is unplayable! 0/10!"
"I had no issues, this game is amazing! 10/10!"

Not sure how you aggregate those experiences within a review or if the reviewer goes on their own experience in a bubble of what other's experienced.


Both reviews should be present, then. Put the timestamp and highlight the mistakes of the first reviewed version, then put the second one which explains the change.

A fair compromise, I do wonder then if this is sorted do you have a third score? Or stick with second saying the issue diminished the experience, but that new comers should refer to the first score since they will not experience it that way.