TheRealMafoo on 11 April 2008
| starcraft said: TheRealMafoo said: What? I never said anything about the 360's graphical capabilities. All I said is because of the tools MS gives developers, it's harder to reduce the OS size (it needs to connect to MSN Messenger, Has a ton of DirectX libraries, etc...) I am a .NET developer, and know MS's tools very well. They make great tools, they just don't do such a hot job of making tools with a small footprint. But I guess if your a fanboy, any criticism about the 360 feels like I am putting everything about the system down ;) The graphical capabilities of the 360 are awesome. I have always thought so, and never said otherwise. Now, didn't you say you were going to post an article as to why someone should want a PS3? If your not a fanboy, that should be easy. Being I have yet to see it... I think that proves my point. Starcraft said: If you go back and check (but I'm sure your already aware of this, you just didn't want to mention it here as it wouldn't support what your saying), I said that over the next three or four weeks I would try to redo the 360 one, and follow it up with a Wii and PS3 article. Your concept of what constitutes "proof" is very interesting Mr Mafoo. At that point you left the thread though I noted you were online for over an hour. I was actually awaiting a response. I'd never figured you for a quitter. Misguided sure, but.......... |
I didn't respond to that because I didn't think it needed one. tomorrow is also "over the next three weeks" You didn't say "In the weeks", you said sometime between today. and three weeks.
And, i am still waiting for that article.
So, the funny thing is in your post to point out how you owned me because I did not respond to something you wrote, also has a confirmation from me about how you lied about saying I called the graphics of the 360 bad, when I never did.... and then you didn't respond to it.
How did I get owned again?
P.S. You have two weeks now :p
