MDMAlliance said:
Rafux said:
Mnementh said:
Rafux said:
Games use art in them buy they are not art in itself, games are toys like monopoly or dungeon and dragons. Google Kojima on the subject, art can be anything but games are toys therefore they must be fun to play first and above all.
|
There I doesn't read that games are not art. Something that makes fun can be very well art. And you cite Kojima, there did Miyamoto said something about games as artform? You take things too far if you conclude from a focus on fun, that fun-things aren't art. I think you don't understand art very well.
|
Learn to read, art can be anything it can be fun but it also doesnt have to be fun to be art, it can be anything.
Games HAVE to be fun above all, thats the catch. A game can't be just an expression and have no fun gameplay mechanics at all it would not be a game at all. Games have literature, drawings and music yet they just use them like a museum would use art to atract viewers but the museum is not art in itself.
Belive what you want though.
|
I kind of think you're wrong on this a little. Games do not necessarily HAVE to be fun. Example are horror games. People do not play them for fun, they play them for the experience. I think the real requirement for a game is that it has to be engaging.
|
Horror games HAVE fun mechanics which goes from blasting throught waves of zombies to escaping from supernatural boss. If people only care about the experience they would just go to the horror house at the carnival or watch screamers on youtube.
The requieremente is fun and challenge can't be more basic than that.
