Scientificreason said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Blob said:
Scientificreason said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Awesome, another game for VGC to throw a fit over because they think some pixels might have been held back. |
People have a right to be miffed when a Dev holds back one version because ms released a weaker console. Many bought a ps4 because it was more powerful. Some people have strong principles
|
Didn't bother anyone back in the ps2 gen when gamecube and xbox games were held back by the ps2.
|
Of course not. Or even last gen with the PS3 being a pain in the ass to develop for. How much extra time did those games require developers to spend on and how much was sacrificed for that time? Who knows. Hell it even affected this gen with Titanfall.
But you don't have to go back that far, just look at this thread. PS4 PS4 PS4. The game is coming to PC as well, and the quote says "parity across all platforms". If anyone should be up in arms it should be PC gamers. But they don't care about their PS4 holding PC gaming back. It's hilarious, it's almost as if some people think the PS4 would be pushing 4k at 240fps if not for the Xbox One holding it back. They are both weak consoles. The Xbox One is slightly weaker. It's not some huge difference. It seems some have trouble accepting this and would rather instead latch onto conspiracies about MS paying developers or developers holding back out of the kindness of their hearts.
|
How? Xbox games liked and ran better then ps2 versions. Show me one person who said they are OK with pc being held back? Everyone expects pc to be better. Not a single truth to your post.
|
Yes it is. You can get a gaming PC for $1200 that is vastly more powerful than a ps4. Yet the graphical difference increase is very poor for the console-first AAA games. For XBO and PS4 gamers the differences are incredibly smaller than PC to console. What he is saying is that you expect the increase to be a lot larger, but it is not for most games.
