GamechaserBE said:
ethomaz said:
Tachikoma said:
Halo 1 - 97
Halo 2 - 95
Halo 3 - 94
Halo 4 - 87
Halo 1-4, all upgraded, all the multiplayer maps all graphically updated andrunning at better framerates and resolutions on a much better server platform than they originally did - 87.
How does this make sense, at all? How can you take three games all over 94, a forth that got 87, strap them all together with updates, upgrades and better performance, and ship them as one complete package for the price of a single game, and still only get 87?
I don't even like xbox, and I actually don't particularly like the Halo series either, but this is bullshit.
|
Ask anybody to reviews these olds games again to see if they will receive the same score... gameplay evolutes over the years... games made in 2000 didn't play well compared with games made in 2010.
Ocarine of Time won't be rated 98 today too.
The core gameplay is dated.
|
Well the 3D version got 94 on metactric last year?
|
It's on handheld so graphics and a few other issues are not present. Also, 94 is a lot different than 99.
