Ka-pi96 said:
Zekkyou said:
HyrulianScrolls said:
I really don't get how a huge collection of 4 games all with a fresh coat of paint and new features, of which the lowest scoring game was an 87, only gets an 87. Especially with TLOU:R getting a 95 despite barely being any different than the original that released a year before it. I swear some of these reviewers are just way too biased against MS right now. This is the third great X1 game in a row that has been too harshly reviewed. You'd think critics would be grateful that X1 is actually delivering some great exclusives while PS4 has nothing to offer there.
|
TLOU:R got a 95 because it was treated like it was a cross gen release, which makes sense, given it was functionally just a late GOTY port.
The MCC on the other hand is being treated like all collection; a value proposition. They've always struggled to get far past the 90 mark. When accounting for the harsher treatment of 8th gen only titles, 87 makes sense.
Critics aren't biased towards anyone. Sony's 8th gen only titles have received just as much flack as MS's ones. This harsher scale has been placed on everyone.
|
Not on Nintendo apparently...
|
Yeah, because Ninetndo is making amazing GAMEPLAY that thank god most critics still can't deny, hard as they may try. And I don't think Nintendo has it nearly as bad right now as MS as far as bias in the industry goes. Everyone just wants to dump on MS right now for some reason (probably cause the last few years of the 360 sucked as far as their support). And I've dumped on MS myself, like most of the 6th and 7th gens where their game delivery paled in comparison to PS2/PS3. But right now they're killing PS4 in that area.
