I'll take Zelda And Mario over Call of Duty, Reggie says.

[Deeds]

Seece said:

Deeds said:

bananaking21 said:

Deeds said:

Seece said:

Sales would suggest WiiU and Nintendo need third parties badly.

The previous generation's winner and the fact that Nintendo is [now] swimming in money proves otherwise.

you realize WiiU is on track to be nintendo's worst selling home console ever, and 3ds is on track to be the lowest selling nintendo handheld ever, right? (not sure what Virtual Boy is considered)

(1) The generation isn't over yet.

(2) Nintendo is making money.

(3) Nintendo is making money without third party multiplats.

It's pretty simple logic really.

1. Nothing is going to change, at this point it'll be a miracle if WiiU overtakes Gamecube

2. Correction, they made a profit this past Q, they're fluctuating between Q's of profit and Q's of losses.

3. That doesn't mean they don't need them, because even when they profit it's far below usual Nintendo like profits. If you think Nintendo want to plod along with measly profits for the next 20 years you're wrong.

And yes, I do know the difference (again) I've provided reasons why they need them, you've not provided anything to argue.

So you are the thousandth person singing Nintendo is doomed because of "x" without realizing why corporations go into business? *yawn* You're boring. As for the bolded part..... nah you dont know.