bugrimmar said:
Norris2k said:
Bombing is very inefficient against population, and mostly used against factories, military offices, or as a psychological warfare against population. I think you don't really understand how much tons it takes. Allies sent 1,500,000 tons on Germany alone. Just think about your "freaking" 11 tons bombs... 15 of them. So, about 1,500,000 tons on Germany, and I don't think it even killed 1 million people. OK, germans could hide better than zombies, but they were easier target in cities than zombies spreading and around civilians you don't want to kill. Vietnam took 7 millions tons and ended by a loss. How many billions tons, and for what consequences ? And, when do you start abandonning the idea of preserving your population, city, facilities ? Before, or after the first billion ?
|
Um.. Humans hide in buildings, hide in underground bunkers, hide in fallout shelters... Do zombies hide? No, they just run at you.. That's the point of this whole thing. Zombies in open field + a huge bomb = death to all zombies.
|
They randomely "hide", they spread, they don't die from wounds, I still think you would have an long and hard time. Also, again, it's not just about firepower (million of tons of TNT equivalent), but how much you can use it inside your own country (civilian casualties, especially if human being became rare), when you start bombinb ("let's just bomb new york, don't care about collateral damages, maximum damages"), and how much it's efficient (and I think it's not su much) But who knows ? lol Anyway, building walls, and an army in integral kevlar suit, firepower etc, I also believe the humankind (the non zombie part of it) would prevail.
