By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed on 04 November 2014
Edit Thread
ethomaz said:

LudicrousSpeed said:

I hope you have someone standing under you with a net in case you fall while making that gargantuan reach. If you can show me a version of the game Respawn released that has a lower resolution than 792p and has a solid 60fps frame rate then I will concede you were right for once. Otherwise, please drop it. What you're doing with this 720p comment is reductio ad absurdum nonsense and it won't be taken seriously. My position is very simple, no reason for you to be confused here.

"Sad to see any developer focusing on something irrelevant to gameplay like resolution at the expense of something crucial to gameplay like frame rate. Especially a CoD developer. Maybe it can be fixed in a patch."

lol

What you is criticizing is exactly what Respawn did.

That's awesome! Just show me the console version of Titanfall Respawn released that has a lower resolution and better frame rate than the Xbone version. Because I can show you a version of AW that Sledgehammer released with a lower resolution and better frame rate.

You're making me laugh with all of this. Instead of more nonsense about what you think I am doing, just answer this: would you rather Sledgehammer implemented the same technique on PS4 that they did on Xbone if it meant a dynamic resolution but a better frame rate? Would you rather GG just made the game 900p or something but as crisp and sharp as possible instead of faking native 1080p but blurring it all to hell?

The difference is in one situation Sledge sacrificed the resolution for a better frame rate, and in the other they held firm on the resolution and the result is a worse frame rate. That didn't happen with Respawn. Hope that helps, it should clear it up for you, but somehow I think it won't.