Assassin’s Creed: Unity – Bullshots VS. In-game graphics comparison

[Chazore]

curl-6 said:

fatslob-:O said:

curl-6 said:

PC certainly does. I can't recall any particularly shitty Xbone ports off the top of my head. Inferior yes, that's almost inevitable given the hardware disparity, but shitty? Not sure. There probably are some, but none come to mind.

Just because the hardware is inferior doesn't mean that the port isn't shitty either ... 

If it's unoptimized for the PS4 then the same holds true for Xbone as well since they both use similar CPU and GPU architectures ... 

It's hard to tell though how much of the disparity is just differences in power and how much is shitty coding.

The way I see it is that Ubisoft just fucks it up for all of us, they've had terrible port jobs, optimization, huge ass delays (looking at you Rayman, Creed and Lastly WD) and then trying to go about doing their self fullfilled prophecies when it comes to Nintendo because Nintendo or any other type of fan shouldn't want shit ports and huge delays, hell Nintendo fans won't even get the DLC so it's technically incomplete if they can't have access to what everyone else does but in the end WD flopped thanks to bullshots and verticle slices, it's looking like the same scenario all over again for Unity and I wouldn't be suprised if it gains the same outcome.

Uplay also still feels completely worthless besides the tiny piece that is the Upoints system, I don't recall consoles having to be stuck with Uplay so god knows why PC are the only ones stuck with it, at least Steam and Origin do and have more value.