By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Burek said:
binary solo said:

I haven't played a PSN+ required multiplayer game since buying PS4 and signing up for PSN+ back in Feb. I got PSN+ for the monthly "free" games on PS3 and PS4 and the value in that alone is immense and worth every [insert your currency] you pay.  Maybe if someone only owns a PS4 the "free" games being made available aren't worth it yet. But for someone with at least 2 out of the 3 PS3/PSV/PS4 one would have to question their sanity if they don't have PSN+.

If we assume PS3 subscribers are pretty flat that probably puts the PS4 subscribers at over 6 million, which is almost double the highest selling PS4 game to date (Destiny).

I only own a PS4, and fund out that my $50 was a waste of money, as I only also play single-player games.

Those "free" games were not a good incentive for me to renew my subscription, as they were all uninteresting for me, and I certainly would never buy a single one of those if they were offered to purchase.

So, I don't see it as getting 12 games for $50, but wasting $50 on no games... Until they start offering good, interesting games, they are not seeing my business...

It certainly helps to own a PS3. I got Tomb Raider 2013 the month I signed up, and Bioshock Infinite, then Dead Space 3, then NBA 2K14. So it's paid for itself right there. Hopefully they will offer decent non indie titles on PS4 soon, but I've enjoyed some of the offerings they've had on PS4 so for me at least PS4 hasn't been a total waste with the PSN+ games.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix