| CGI-Quality said: This is the same site and same Ryse pic pack, fool! Regardless, how anyone can say that doesn't look much different is beyond me. |
Selective aknowledgement.
I remember "obvious win for xbox" arguments and "looks night and day better" for the following games.
COD: Ghosts, 928x600 PS3, 1024x600 360 : pixel difference : 57,600
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood, 1152x640 PS3, 1280x672 360 : pixel difference : 122,880
Assassins Creed 3, 1280x718 PS3, 1280x720 360 : pixel difference : 2,560
People saw the differences here, with less than 150k difference, and now people are claiming no difference when the pixel difference is on average at least 633,600, a 5x increase in difference over last gen?
Then theres the way tesxture filtering was handled, "textures are blurrier on the ps3, easy xbox win".
Now the tables are turned suddenly the differences that were pointed out for basically every third party multiplat are suddenly insignificant.
Also, a point people like to ignore completely, there's an inherant problem with people doing comparisons based on a native image being stretched to match that of the other console for comparison, namely the systems used by applications like photoshop for upscaling are significantly better, and more powerful than a standard video upscaler.
