CGI-Quality said:
The X1 version very well may sell more in the US, perhaps the UK, not everywhere else. A moot point either way, since we're talking technical differences, not commercial. OT: Interesting watching differences being brushed aside this go around. Far smaller ones were promoted last gen, and by some of the very same folks claiming it doesn't matter now. Always get a chuckle at that. Fortunately for some of us, the differences are meaningless, as we're buying it on PC. |
it have been proved that the difference between 717p-720p in ps3_x360 is more perceptive than 900-1080p or even 720-1080p between x1-ps4 when generation changed, didn't you get the memo?
At OP: I won't buy the game since Ubisoft opened my eyes that anything over 900p60fps is detrimental to the game. Will pirate on PC to play in all the glory of 720p30fps AA off and low settings.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








