| maxima64 said: to Hynad Its clear you have not been followig the thread, to prove a point you at least need back up and the sources and explanation megafenix provided are clear; sure he mistook something like the framebuffers for gbuffers from shinens comment but at least he admitted, and the way shinen made the comment without checking others peoples comments could also be mistook by anyoneit wheres others here even when the proof is in front of their noses wont admit their mistakes. I actually like the thread, even if the gbuffers resulted in frmaebuffers, knowing that shinen is able to put triple buffering 720p on edram, a gbuffer for the defered rendering(in the tweet they confirm the use of this technique and likely the gbuffer is also being used for post processing effects) and intermediate buffers kind of proves that the wii u edram bandwidth could indeed be in the 500GB/s bandwidth or more since even xbox one esram was running short for 900p(could be double buffering but they dont mention if its one, two or three buffers so must likely is 2 which is almost the same as 3 buffers of 720p) and the gbuffer, and wii u is using 720p triple buffers, gbuffer for defered render and post processign effects and many intermediate buffers, thats a great deal sicne would be impossible to do it with less bandwidth that the xbox one esram has and also esram has adventages like no refreshing which gives better performance over edram |
I have read the whole thread. Thank you very much.
That being said, I would say "it is clear you don't know Megafenix's history on VGC"... But something tells me you know him very, very well.
EDIT, after your ban: Ha ha. It's quite sad (yet very much hilarious) that you need to act as someone else to try to have someone support you in this thread.
