Neodegenerate said:
prinz_valium said:
theprof00 said:
Seece said:
iTechHeads said:
Seece said:
Bargin bin ... dear lord. $400 to $350 a year after launch is not bargin bin, and I hardly see this hurting MS/XB1 ...
|
They're devaluing their product by doing constant price cuts and free game giveaways.
A product that is popular and selling well doesn't have price cuts and free game promotions every month. It doesn't need them.
BTW, the Xbox One launched at $500, not $400.
|
New sku minus kinect, not price cut. Big difference. If I was in the market for an XB1 today I would have to pay $450, that's only $50 less than what I got it at launch. (Because I would want Kinect model).
They're not devaluing, they're becoming competitive. And they're doing it to beat PS4, not because it's selling badly (not that I think it's selling fantastically either).
Some incredible reaching going on in this thread.
|
So the logic here then, is if they remove something, then it isn't a price-cut?
So when sony did the ps3 redesign and took out a bunch of stuff like backwards compatibility, that wasn't a price-cut? I'm trying to think now if ps3 ever had a price-cut now.
|
u should compare to the x360 core, arcade, pro and elite version
if u got a 349 bucks 250gb elite version
release a 199 bucks 8gb arcade edition and cut the elite to 299
do u have a 150 bucks pricecut?
|
Short answer is no.
|
Good to know, PS3 did not have any price cuts. Bought mine for 399 euro without ps2 compatiliblty in 2008. We only had one version.
