| DanneSandin said: This line up is too far fetched imo. What Sony should have focused on is portablility; price and games. And I'll tell you this; if Nintendo struggled to get decent 3DS sales, so would Sony no matter what they did |
The 3DS had no games though for a long while.
Whats particularly far fetched about the list though? Far fetched in that sony wouldn't do it (because they're not smart enough), or far fetched in that it wouldn't be feasible for them to release, fund all those games?
Most of those games are coming from studios who produced a game for sony in that same period, I'm suggesting a lot of them should have been repurposed in terms of what they made. Elderscrolls is pretty much the only big release without a listed studios but as its a port sony could have outsourced it just like Epic Mickey was (sony paid for that), or ''Borderlands 2 late'' sony also ported that. I mean guys sony set up a whole studio to throw money at devs, I think alot of the above only seems far fetched because it was so above and beyond what sony offered but their output in the reality was not far below what I'm proposing.
StarHawk, Unit 13, Resistence Burning Skies, Sly Cooper 4, Vita pets... just a handful of games sony commisioned where the resources were in my opinion wasted completely wasted.
