rocketpig said:
It's always a bad thing. Who decides what gets censored? Who declares themselves so omnipotent as to believe their line of thought is the only correct one? Most importantly, what happens when you disagree? |
This cencorship is by no means negative , I could even argue I was taking the objective standpoint in saying so.
Killing takes lives
Drink Driving Takes Lives
Drugs takes lives
Cars also takes lives ( but the benefits of cars such as ease of transport,ambulances,economy make it apparent that the benefits of veichles outweigh the apparent disadvantages.)
It's generaly accepted that Killing,Drink Driving and Drugs are harmful because of the apparent effect they have on people , we aren't dependant upon them for happiness,economic growth,survival etc infact their benefits are tiny and often limited to an individual therfore we can come to the pretty objective conclusion that the above are indeed bad.the benefits of these things are significantly outweighed by the disadvantages.
If you put all these bad elements(objectivley speaking) into a game then censorship of this is reasonable regardless of what you opinion is.
Obviously no human can truly claim the objective standpoint but that's another argument.
