this guy completely confuses 2 groups of people.
One is playing fresh fun new games. The other one is whining about resolution.
For years third party studios etc have made games for mainstreamers and tought them to only care about visuals because the rest is unimportant crap anyway. And now third party wonders why people just care about visuals (the PR visual stuff that is resolution etc.).
As long as the framerate is sufficuent for the type of game (e.g 20 would in theory be enough for a turn based RPG since there is no "action" that requires precision. Racing games, platformers and shooters should always be as high as possible) It is fine.
Shooters also do benfit from higher resolution so in that sence it would be smart to have a 1080p/4k with 60fps+ shooter that dials back on polycount/particles etc in favor of fps and resolution yet alot of modern games do the exact opposite Visual crap in favor of gameplay important stuff like FPS or in some cases resolution. (resolution = some cases because a e.g COD does not need such a high resolution as BF does platformers also dont really need 1080p+ since nothing is so far away that 1080p/4k would give much of a benefit. FPS is always important tho)
