Leadified said:
WagnerPaiva said:
Leadified said:
So you jump on this article because you think you can use that to defend creationism yet you ignore the fact those bones are 64 million years old. They have also found tissue from wooly mammoth that was 10,000 years old, which even that is 3 times more than your timescale.
Did bronze age people ride Mammoths and Dinosaurs? They must have at least seen them and written about them if there were giant reptiles and mammals stomping about. It rained for 45 days in Texas a few years back, why wasn't Texas under the sea? Where did Noah's water come from and where did it go? You still have a lot of questions to answer. |
Yes. I have found more than a dozen of diferent researchers that found this same results in diferent places. 3 of them were fired.
So I think we are into something really important and big. And, sadly, it will not be acepted.
|
Mary Higby Schweitzer who is responsible for the discovery still has her job. She has worked on research with her colleagues at North Carolina State University and they will continue to do more research. Also her research and theories are now being more accepted because of more evidence, so what is not accepted here?
|
Oh, I am sorry. I thought you guys were making fun of the research. Then it is all good.
