By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
VanceIX said:
Scoobes said:
I put this in the other thread:

"I call overinflated bullshit.

Bethesda have done it with a few games already, as has EA with SoM, so why not Ubisoft? My guess is the minimum spec will play at 1080p, 60fps, Ultra graphics settings. Recommended will be for 4K or something equally ridiculous.

I'm starting to get suspicious that publishers are striking deals with hardware manufacturers to over inflate their minimum specs. Bring on the conspiracy theories!"

I stand by this. I think people with weaker systems will still be able to play at lower graphics settings. If not, it'll be modded until they can.

AC4 was barely playable on even better hardware. My 7970 occasionally chugged in jungle areas on ultra, which is just sad. I would not put it past Ubisoft to release such a shit port that it really can only run well on top of the line hardware.

So entitled. Why does Ubisoft have to spend so much effort getting the game to run the way you like it when chances are you are gonna pay for the game at a discounted rate. Its not like Ubisoft gets any money from your fancy specs. Run it in medium, it only hurt for a second.

When a compnay does stuff liek this people start to pirate the game.  For a few reasons

1. Spite

2. They are not sure if game will run on their PC, so pirate it so don't waste $60 on a game their PC can't run.

And fuck $60.  Look at League of Legends.  That game is racking in money hand over fist and pretty sure its a FREE game.  or it was last time I played it.  Funny how people can play a free game for 1000's of hours and yet barely get 10 hours out of a $60 game.  oh and not to mention with game like AC or other "BLOCKBUSTERS" there is no need to wait for a steam sale.  The game will be 50% off in 2 months at most, the fact that they never stay near $60 shows that they are not worth that.